Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #1748, comment 4
- Timestamp:
- 10/12/18 20:22:58 (2 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #1748, comment 4
v1 v2 3 3 The same certainly does not go for !AppImage, because one of the non-technical, philosophical core ideas of !AppImage is that the upstream developers can use it to provide their own self-built binaries (not just source code) remaining firmly under their own control to whoever wants them, downloadable from their own website and working on most recent and not-so-recent Linux distributions. Which is what this packaging request ticket asks for.... 4 4 5 Your conclusion ''"same as for Flatpak goes for AppImage"'' is solely yours, not to be found on the flatkill.org site. I would like to see some corrobating evidence for your conclusion, if there is. Maybe I'm wrong, but currently don't see how.5 Your conclusion ''"same as for Flatpak goes for !AppImage"'' is solely yours, not to be found on the flatkill.org site. I would like to see some corrobating evidence for your conclusion, if there is. Maybe I'm wrong, but currently don't see how.