xpra icon
Bug tracker and wiki

This bug tracker and wiki are being discontinued
please use https://github.com/Xpra-org/xpra instead.

Opened 3 years ago

Closed 3 years ago

Last modified 9 months ago

#2089 closed defect (fixed)

Hashes for installation files

Reported by: stdedos Owned by: Antoine Martin
Priority: minor Milestone: 2.5
Component: packaging Version: 2.4.x
Keywords: Cc:

Description (last modified by Antoine Martin)

Files with hashes for the "official" version are wrong:


Also, is there a reason files are named '.sha' for the SHA-1 hash?
HashCheck (at least v2.4.0, https://github.com/gurnec/HashCheck) recognizes (and binds automatically during installation) .sha1 files to match & check them.

Unless there is some reason, would you consider renaming them?

Change History (4)

comment:1 Changed 3 years ago by Antoine Martin

Description: modified (diff)
Resolution: fixed
Status: newclosed

Done, we still have both in the download directories for now.
Just in case there are links to those.

comment:2 Changed 3 years ago by stdedos

Maybe I should've been more specific (or opened a separate ticket?)

The dist files contain wrong data for verification purposes:

bfbf0f47cbb7c8df9e4468c161aa3053  Xpra-x86_64_Setup_2.4.2-r21077.exe

e2da148f53f4147d99dd63a529e7e0217f21910c  Xpra-x86_64_Setup_2.4.2-r21077.exe

whereas the setup filename is Xpra-x86_64_Setup.exe (https://www.xpra.org/dists/windows/Xpra-x86_64_Setup.exe)

I understand why, but it impedes automatic verification.

comment:3 Changed 3 years ago by Antoine Martin

Oh, now I get it.

Wontfix: those are symlinks, apache doesn't know how to show them.

comment:4 Changed 9 months ago by migration script

this ticket has been moved to: https://github.com/Xpra-org/xpra/issues/2089

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.