#2881 closed enhancement (fixed)
generate .xpra file from html5 client connect form
Reported by: | Antoine Martin | Owned by: | Mark Harkin |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | 4.1 |
Component: | html5 | Version: | 3.0.x |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Suggested in #2874.
Change History (7)
comment:1 follow-up: 2 Changed 5 months ago by
Owner: | changed from Antoine Martin to Mark Harkin |
---|
comment:2 Changed 5 months ago by
@mjharkin: does that work for you?
From a quick test looks very good, thanks. I'll give it a bit more testing in the next few days. only tested connection files so far.
For windows /win32/xpra.iss will need to be updated with custom protocol renaming.
Also would be nice to have connect.html port set to 80/443 based on window.location.protocol if not explicitly set in url
comment:3 follow-up: 4 Changed 5 months ago by
For windows /win32/xpra.iss will need to be updated with custom protocol renaming.
Ooops, thanks. Done in r27573.
Also would be nice to have connect.html port set to 80/443 based on window.location.protocol if not explicitly set in url
Ah, right, I always test with high ports and those do get populated...
Does r27574 work for you?
comment:4 Changed 5 months ago by
Replying to Antoine Martin:
Does r27574 work for you?
Doesn't seem to work and I think maybe this is more generic https://github.com/mjharkin/Xpra/commit/a0ede788624bdc219a3f0a253ac96b54e9775e1f
comment:5 follow-up: 6 Changed 5 months ago by
Doesn't seem to work and I think maybe this is more generic
Thanks, applied in r27577.
Can we close this ticket?
comment:6 Changed 5 months ago by
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Replying to Antoine Martin:
Doesn't seem to work and I think maybe this is more generic
Thanks, applied in r27577.
Can we close this ticket?
Looks good, thanks. Yes, let's close this.
comment:7 Changed 5 weeks ago by
this ticket has been moved to: https://github.com/Xpra-org/xpra/issues/2881
update-mime-database
after installing the updated desktop files)I think the URI launch is much better than using the connection file, but both are there.
@mjharkin: does that work for you?