#310 closed defect (fixed)
OR windows can go awol
Reported by: | Antoine Martin | Owned by: | Antoine Martin |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | blocker | Milestone: | 0.9 |
Component: | server | Version: | trunk |
Keywords: | Cc: | onlyjob@… |
Description
Reproducible using gnome-terminal: simply move through the drop down menus quickly until one of them goes missing.
A "the window (...) is not composited!?
" message shows up in the logs.
This a server issue and re-connecting the client does not solve the problem..
Change History (9)
comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by
Owner: | changed from Antoine Martin to Antoine Martin |
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by
Cc: | onlyjob@… added |
---|
comment:4 follow-up: 5 Changed 9 years ago by
But... we have lost tooltips (#262 related?), as can be easily seen by running filelight
which makes heavy use of them. Bummer!
comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by
Replying to totaam:
But... we have lost tooltips (#262 related?), as can be easily seen by running
filelight
which makes heavy use of them. Bummer!
I'm testing r3072 and I see tooltips in filelight
... They were disappearing after some time but from the first quick try I couldn't reproduce that in r3072 so it could become a bit better (if it's not my wishful thinking).
comment:6 Changed 9 years ago by
r3116 fixes the tooltips: it was opengl not notifying us of mouse motion events.
So maybe this ticket can be closed after all? Feedback welcome.
comment:7 Changed 9 years ago by
Looks like tooltips were broken only in opengl mode (that's why I couldn't reproduce as I was trying with "--opengl=no").
It appears to works well with r3118 so I think this bug can be closed. Thanks.
comment:8 Changed 9 years ago by
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
comment:9 Changed 17 months ago by
this ticket has been moved to: https://github.com/Xpra-org/xpra/issues/310
Here is a full debug log of such an instance (removing some pointer-position packets for readability):
I think the problem comes from here:
Which comes from r2304 and our attempts at dealing with gtkperf more gracefully..